Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus STATE

Section 302 (d) definition of evidence, reduction of sentence, reduction of two witnesses completely stranded on the charge that the witnesses agreed that on the relevant date, time and place the accused had placed two rifles on the victim. Who were killed instantly. As a result, no contradiction was found, the witnesses of any major detail of the incident are independent and their testimony affected their confidence, the accused did not accept his conviction in the circumstances and only Had prayed for a reduction in punishment. In his statement under Section 342, CCPC, he admitted that he fired two shots at the accused with a rifle, though he had requested that the deceased plead with him for misconduct, but in support of the accused's plea. No substance is available on the record. The defendant did not present any evidence in the evidence for his version of the medical evidence was fully supported and the doctor's testimony as a contradictory evidence of ocular testimony was in complete harmony with the account and both presented by the prosecution's witness There was no least contradiction between the stories, which was the father of the deceased, which was also credible and there were more supporting cases of ocular testimony, pieces of prosecutorial evidence on record doubted the accused's guilt on the record. Surpassed any shadow of, was found to be rightly guilty of the situation according to the complainant's version He acted under his father's command. , Who sentenced the accused to death by a trial court, sentenced him to life imprisonment. lawer from fb area from Hattian lawyer