SHAH MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the suspension of the accused was challenged by the High Court to dismiss and dismiss the defendant's earlier request for suspension of his convictions. ? The plea, nor was it reflected in the same cruel order under which his convictions were suspended and he was released on bail, with other pleas filed by various lawyers on behalf of the accused. Was described as extremely outdated and a similar case was taken in a subsequent petition. It was previously considered and rejected that the demonstrators deprived them of their right to get bail privileges while demonstrating. The appeal for leave of appeal was consequently changed to appeal and the bail was withdrawn for bail by the High Court through an improper order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Kurram lawyer
