FAISAL RAUF MALIK versus MESSRS CITIBANK N.A.
Articles 9 and 10, suit for recovery of loan amount, leave for defense claim, the defendant's plea was that the case was not filed by an authorized person. And the statement of accounts was not correct, the banking court rejected the leave request. Otherwise, the case can be filed only by an authorized person in which the bank records debit entries in favor of the person who allegedly executed the Record Power of Attorney. Was not executed in the name of Credit card terms and conditions that were not before the Banking Court Banking Court did not specify anything about the motion to leave, the High Court accepted the appeal, disputed the controversial decision / order Doing so, allowed an unconditional leave request and remanded the banking court. For a fresh decision by law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer
