Find a Lawyer

DILAWAR KHAN versus STATE

Articles 2 302, 4 364, 9379, 1111, & 201 & and Q 34 Qanun testimony (of 1984 1984), Article evidence 40 Definition of evidence The deceased was last seen in the company of the accused, he was a motorcycle. The complainant was linked to the possession and recovery of the victim, who was the victim's father, who said that the victim had accompanied the accused 21/22 days before the matter was reported to the police. Do not report the matter to the police for 20/21 days and no plausible explanation has been given for such a long delay as in normal circumstances the father whose son was missing will not wait for so long to give evidence. There was no record available from the date of his disappearance in the body of the accused until the recovery of his body, evidence that the accused was pointing to the place while he was in custody. Legal proceedings did not proceed because Section 40 of the Law Q Testimony 1984 of of 40 is inadmissible provided that the information in detention And be admitted and will be relevant when it is discovered in any evidence. The trial court's dismissal of the alleged extra-judicial confession made by the accused before the prosecution's witnesses was dismissed for mere reasons and the trial court erred in dismissing the story of the extra-judicial confession. Whether the recovered body was found or not was ultimately proved by the prosecution by the prosecution, in which case, the trial court failed to prove its case against the accused in any way. , Under which the suspects were convicted and sentenced online advocate from Kurram lawyer