Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus FATEH ALI

Section 8 and 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) treaty of title and occupation, proof of ownership, the plaintiff alleges that the disputable variable and recovered. Demanded. The plaintiff plaintiff claimed her title to the suit land on the basis of a sale agreement but the original contract was not presented to the trial court to prove the agreement, the defendant submitted the application author's register And a copy of the relevant page of the register was deemed proof. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, but the Appellate High Court reversed the trial by the Appellate High Court under the jurisdiction of the amended jurisdiction and the trial court adjourned the case. Argued. The copy of the relevant page of the applicant's author and the registrar may have been due to the fact that the parties had agreed to share the suit with the ND and the controversial mutual agreement was approved on the basis of the agreement. Was rightly rejected because a copy of the relevant page of the Register can only indicate that some agreement was made by the petition author whose contract did not create any right or interest in the property because it was merely a promise. Granting the right to enforce plaintiffs' right to a suit was properly upheld by the High Court. Rennes was refused leave \ \ r n inheritance advocates near Mangi lawyer