MIAN MUHAMMAD AZAM versus RETURNING OFFICER, CONSTITUENCY PP-82, JHANG-VI
Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 and 63 The nomination papers filed by the applicant were rejected on the basis that they cited contradictory educational qualifications in the nomination papers filed in the 2008 general election. The applicant was of the view that his case was a lack of equality of education qualifications and not a question of the validity of the fake degrees, the question of the truth of the degree held by the applicant and the papers submitted by him in the nomination in 2008. Was relied upon by the applicant and it was decided in the petitioner In the case of lack of equality of qualifications and the degree held by the applicant was not declared as fake or fraudulent and this decision was carried out in the field and was not separated by any decision as to attack. The constitutional petition filed for the said The verdict cannot be ruled out and disapproved because the assemblies were standing with dissolved degrees. They could not be said to have declared the applicant, under these circumstances, to be falsified and forged, approved by the Returning Officer. The counterfeit order was declared illegal and set aside.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
