Section 302 (b) Definition of the Qatil-e-Amad evidence The benefit of the doubt depended primarily on the statement of the complainant and the other witness of the prosecution, which was actually established at the time of the FIR Minor's registration. The prosecution's witnesses showed how they identified the accused during all their activities on the roof of the room, which was also unreliable and the prosecution's witnesses in their statements on the oath were also not. , Did not identify the location of the electric light with any accuracy. He helped identify the alleged prosecution witnesses of the assailants, who was a lumberman, had a political personality nearby, and admittedly had a political animosity in the village. And said that as well as the accused, the prosecution's own evidence was from different political groups, the prosecution's witnesses could not, in these circumstances, be called independent witnesses because the prosecution's case against the accused was complete with material improvement. And the story of the prosecution's involvement in the case was very suspicious, the prosecutor failed to prove his case against the suspects beyond the shadow of suspicion and could not maintain the culprit's conviction simply because of his pistol recovery. And the sentence recorded by the trial court against the accused was taken aside, taking advantage of the doubt and was released, under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
