Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the cancellation of section 302 bail, the application for a medical certificate and the deceased's son, who was the admission of the prosecution's testimony, reflected that the deceased kidney patient The scuffle was, according to prosecutors' story, the accused accused of cutting down trees which would not have been possible without any sharp cutting tools / weapons if the accused intended to cause the death of the deceased. The sharp-cut weapon could be used, but no such charge was found. The accused contradicted the complainant's statement that the accused had beaten the applicant / complainant's father and then fell down, apparently leading to further investigation because of his evidence. I was not supported by his other brother and the complainant's lawyer was also unsuccessful. To confirm, if a sharp cutting weapon / equipment with which the accused was seen cutting a tree has been recovered, any weakness, request to cancel the bail is dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
