KHAIRAT MUHAMMAD versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT
Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for Interpretation Orders filed for dissolution of marriage on behalf of wife seeking adulthood, the husband submitted his written statement and five of the wife's evidence was complete The husband, given the opportunity, failed to present his evidence, the Family Court upheld the husband's evidence and adjourned the case for further proceedings. The Waldetti Family Court was justified in discharging the husband's right to proof because the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, a brief law was enacted, aimed at resolving marital disputes as quickly as possible and providing no such provision. It does not exist that in any case approved by the Family Court, the party's evidence will not be closed and the same can be allowed for an exception. Constitutional jurisdiction because it will only be delayed in the High Court case. Illegal jurisdiction, refused to interfere with the family court's order because it was inherently inappropriate.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Sadiqabad lawyer