Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, RAWALPINDI


Sections 249A, 417 (2A) and 439 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 427 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Sessions Court on behalf of the complainant against the verdict by a defective decision. The revision request filed by was dismissed. Section 249A, Criminal Court cannot be amended or treated without recording the record or recording of the evidence by the trial court, as the trial court is not authorized by the trial court. Yes, this is a legal practice. By order of acquittal of the accused by trial, the provisions of the aggravating law had the right to appeal under section 417 (2A), CRPC, and in the presence of procurement through appeal, There was a review request. Not eligible under Section 9439 (), the CCC Sessions Court properly rejected the constitutional application was dismissed accordingly [Mohammed Yasin Bin Mohammed Haneef and others 1997 PCLLJ 1626]

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Kundina lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.