Find a Lawyer

FAYYAZ MEHMOOD KHAN versus STATE

The value of the evidence of section 7 337A (ii) / 34 because the incident was not proved, recording of the statement of the woman witness mentioned under section 161, CCC PACE after more than seven months had passed since the incident. Pointed out that she was initially unwilling to support the prosecution's story, or that according to her own version of the complainant was unconscious at the time of the incident, other eyewitnesses were either witnesses of the occasion or they were prosecuted. The hearing had improved his statements and contradicted other witnesses. Ocular testimony contradicts medical evidence None of the independent witnesses was gathered nearby. On the spot either during the investigation or at trial the version of the work was presented to confirm the plaintiff's trial as well as the appellate court misread or not read the evidence on record and on the complainant's statement The accused was charged with material misconduct in relying on him, he was acquitted of circumstances on the benefit of the doubt. \ R \ n online advocate from Hattar lawyer