Find a Lawyer

MESSRS HOTUMAL, COMMISSION AGENT AND FERTILIZER AGENCY, JHOL DISTRICT SANGHAR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 122 (1) and 122 Income Tax Ordinance (XXXX of 1979), Sections 13 (1) (A) and 59 (1) Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 XXV 2000), Section 2 (3) ) The appraiser of the appraisal amendment was frustrated by the commissioner's refusal to amend the appraisal of the self-appraisal investor by the return of the self-assessment, including agricultural income for the purpose of quoting Rs.100,000. The complainant encountered a contradiction in the statement of wealth on the showcase notice issued by the Additional Commissioner, Income Tax, which was accepted. Since it did not include agricultural land, it intended to amend the assessment under section 13 (AA) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, and to accept the complaint for obtaining agricultural land on Makata (lease). Under Section 122A of the Income Tax, a complaint has been filed before the Commissioner Income Tax for an increase of Rs.400,000. The affidavit of Mumtaz is admissible on the ax of the Kalahari Ordinance, 2001, which was not in the name of the complainant. There was no evidence that the verbal transaction amount of Rs.400,000 on the deceased / lease was invalid as the lease was made unclear. The complainant himself did not specify that the source of income of Rs. 1,00,000 announced in the return was denied by the zonal commissioner without examining the facts of the case, otherwise he could have resolved the complainant's original complaint. Was. The Federal Tax Ombudsman therefore instructed the Income Tax Commissioner to revoke the order passed under Section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 under Section 122 (1) of the Income Tax Commissioner. Pass a new order advocate for immigration from Kumbh lawyer