FAROOQ AHMAD versus STATE
After the completion of the investigation of the petition to declare Section 7 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302, the report was submitted to the court charge under section 173 and the evidence of eight witnesses was recorded, only the investigation. The officer's statement remains to be recorded when, when the accused moved a request for medical examination under section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 and declared him juvenile, he was subsequently questioned by the trial court and the accused. The request filed by the headmaster of the school concerned was presented with a record that was unambiguously shown on the date of the accused's birth. The accused suspect's age was more than 18 years, at the time of commission of the crime, in the record age records of the accused, which was beyond any doubt, the Medical Expert opinion regarding the age of the accused was not required for trial. Demanding the prosecution's plea not to be subjected to any unlawful action: There is nothing in the D Primary Fox show record that the accused was under 18 years of age, dismissing a review petition against the trial court's order. Gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Head Marala lawyer