Find a Lawyer

ALEEM ASHRAF versus STATE

Section 2 (e), 7b & 13 (2) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 4 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 353, 380, 452, 506, 186, 148 and 149 of the evidence Anti-Terrorism Court Scope Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Anti-Terrorism Court In which the challan of the case was presented, the petitioner / accused, who was minor, had earlier filed the petition stating that He was a minor, the case should be referred to the Juvenile Court. The petition was rejected by the court, saying that it had jurisdiction to entertain and decide its case. The petitioner filed a review before the High Court against the order of the Anti-Terrorism Court, which was amended in the Constitution of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. In the process, when the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 came into existence and it was said that the ordinance that came into existence after the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, would take priority under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the section of the Constitutional Court Judicial Justice System Ordinance, 2000. Established under Section 4, a special jurisdiction was granted to hear cases in which a child was accused of commissioning a crime if the legislature intended to give the anti-terrorism court this authority, it can be. The same was provided by the Legislature and powers could be given to the Anti-Terrorism Court; there was no need to provide a different way to grant powers under Section 4 of the Judicial Justice System Ordinance, 2000. All other judicial matters by the jurisdiction of the accused who was a minor / minor. online advocate from Jehlum lawyer