Sections 12 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), suits Articles 115 and 96 for specific performance and injunction pending the application of the appellate court rule in the present case, after the trial court's consideration It was permissible to reject the order. Given the documentary evidence and the requests on the parties' records, the principle of lis pendant for the specific performance of the agreement between the parties was applied in the same way that when the plaintiff ultimately succeeded in this case, then the principle of Les Pendens was all over. Attracted to With respect, the first appellate court rejected the trial court's order after judicial application and used its discretion on stable principles, refusing to issue a temporary injunction, and, in the circumstances, the first person authorized There was very limited jurisdiction to interfere with the discretion. Unless and until the appellate court was used consciously or arbitrarily, which in the present case is the rule of law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
