Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ versus STATE

The applicants / suspects of the suspension of Article 426 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 of the sentence were not declared a jury. According to the medical, the report of the accused board of doctors at the time of medical examination was 23 years, which would mean that he was under 18 years of age at the time of the incident. In a preliminary report under section 173, the CCP showed that the accused was acquitted, however, in the subsequent investigation and the subpoena, both were convicted. The third accused was 65 years of age. And was subsequently acquitted in two consecutive investigations on the basis of which it was placed in column number 2 in the preliminary report under Section 173, CRPC and it was only in the subsequent investigation. The accused was out on bail during the trial because of his age and the fact that he was suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis. The petitions of the petitioners, the applicants, were suspended till the final disposal of their appeals. law websites from Nawab Shah lawyer