Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.5698/LB AND M.A. (COND.) NO.831/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 13TH JANUARY, 2005 versus I.T.A. NO.5698/LB AND M.A. (COND.) NO.831/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 13TH JANUARY, 2005

Sections 134 (3) and 66 Appeal Tribunal Limitations for Appeal Decision Approval of Delay of Communications The Assisi held that the limitation period for filing an appeal begins with the date of communication of the order. Was not performed or estimated by this succ. Appeal was filed after obtaining certified copies of the order which may be delayed in filing the appeal. Because of this, the appellate tribunal's opinion was not accepted by the appellate tribunal as all matters aggravated by it had already been decided and decided. Appeal Tribunal Appeals filed by Department Communication, providing, displaying, demonstrating, granting meaning to others, succeeding in deciphering their meaning and order, if at least some of the order has been communicated to the First Appellate Authority Appeal Tribunal will be processed at the time of hearing of the appeal and before the appellate tribunal at least before filing an appeal before the appellate tribunal but after reviewing the order within the appropriate time of the appellate tribunal. Failed to file appeal, after more than ten years, the Appellate Tribunal has No feasible explanation was offered for the reach. The Income Tax Ordinance had already been the subject of an appeal filed by the Department before the Appellate Tribunal in 1979, and the Appellate Tribunal had already concluded conclusions on matters which could be subject to the appeal which was delayed in filing the appeal. No justification for expressing was available. Appellate Tribunal upheld miscellaneous plea for contempt of delay in filing appeal how to become a advocate from Hayatabad lawyer