Find a Lawyer

KHALIQ JAN versus STATE

Under Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), appreciating section 103 evidence, the law did not prohibit a police officer from becoming a complainant if he was a witness to the commission of a crime and could also request an investigation officer. Is. Section 103, CRPC was removed by Section 25 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, requiring the companionship of two more respected persons in the area where no recovered, highway, roadside or any moving vehicle Was made from The police officials were not denied the accused when the prosecution witnesses made permanent statements on material points without any contradiction in the case, there was no resentment or resentment by the accused against the prosecution witnesses. They did not know before that the defense evidence was the latter was not able to show that the report on the marijuana recovered from the accused by the Chemical Examiner was positive n the accused under section 4040 ((?)) was his own. Appearing as a witness, the CCPC's reversal of the prosecution's story was also fatal to him and the circumstances of the defendants' conviction. I was retained \ r \ n \ r \ n best law firms from Sidhnoti lawyer