Find a Lawyer

MESSRS QUALITY WEAVING MILLS LTD. versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Article 3 Maintaining the Appeal Constitutional Appeal The complex and controversial questions of contractual obligations and facts consisted of constitutional petitions, which, in these circumstances, could not be considered fair treatment and the party substituted. Had to find out, the contractual obligations or questions arising out of the effective and reasonable procurement of the civil suit had to be resolved by the civil court because one party was charged with material facts while the other denied the facts. And on that occasion, the best and proper forum was the civil court. In the present case, the question of instability regarding the basis of the facts before the Supreme Court, for the determination of legal disputes / contradictions as well as the facts, was therefore not a trivial matter of admitted facts which led to the law. I have the edge. It may be determined that the Artera, passed by the Single Judge, could not be returned to the Court of Appeal and the case was not appropriate The appellant was rightly instructed to interfere with the decision of the Single Judge, if that advice was given, Get Procured Through Civil Court attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gari Mori lawyer