Find a Lawyer

ADIL ABDUL JABBAR versus CHAIRMAN, SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Sections 2A & 4 Securities and Exchange Ordinance (XVII 1969), Sections 3, 4, 5, 34 and 35 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Service Termination of Employment, Determination of Employees' Services Since the Stock Exchange The Clerks, after they were terminated, filed a complaint in the Labor Court seeking redress of their grievances, which was approved by the Labor Court and returned to the applicants by the employer's appeal against the Labor Court decision. It was instructed to restore it with benefits. , The Labor Appellate Tribunal did not reject the Labor Court's decision regarding the complaints filed by applicants before the Labor Court because the applicants were public servants under Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, and the Service Tribunal only Had exclusive jurisdiction to decide on matters related to Their terms and conditions of service can be treated as a stock exchange only owned by or owned by a corporation established by a federal government under section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 Or even for this matter the exchange established and registered under the Securities and Exchange Order cannot be considered a corporation so the established stock exchange was not owned. The Federal Government's control of expression and expression was a law enforced under Article 1212 of the Constitution of All Controls Service Tribunals Act, 1973, and although Parliament is capable of declaring a person to be present in the service of Pakistan, Such a person has to perform. This is the case with a private duty exchange clerk, an element of public duty divorce advocates from Qalandarabad lawyer