Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AHMAD ALIAS DANYAL versus THE STATE

Section 4 and 5 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (b) Convention e testimony (10 of 1984), Arts 22 and 129 Definition of Evidence Diagnostic Tests In the absence of any evidence that the prosecution witness testified on the day, time. The suspect was seen and at the location of the incident, the identification test would not carry any weight as it did not endorse any statement of the prosecution's witness when it was suspected that the presence of the prosecution witness at the relevant time at the time of the incident. Had improved his statement during the recorded evidence in his statement. It was very unsafe for police to rely on a witness without proving evidence, which undermined his credibility, and lacked the statement of another prosecutor who had neither. Confidence was impressive and dependence could not be the basis of punishment. The accused prosecution cited three eyewitnesses, but only two were examined and a third person was not presented. The trial court did not provide a reason for recording its statement and for not investigating the prosecution. ? Under the example of Article 129 of the Witness Law Testimony, 1984, the inferences can be easily drawn, stating that the third witness was examined, he would not have supported the prosecution. Investigation of the witness mentioned in the case adversely affected the prosecution's FIR, which does not have the name of a blind man, in which a delay of 24 days in conducting the identity test of the accused and the arrest of the police is sufficient. Had to remain under remand for a period. It cannot be explained by the prosecutor's age at the time of recording the statement of the prosecutor's witness. best law firms from Chishtian lawyer