Find a Lawyer

HARCHAND versus STATE

Section 4 324, 3 Anti3 and Anti 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6 Definition of Evidence No police officer or anyone else was injured in this incident nor were found vacant or replaced by Word. He was produced before the court. The witnesses, who claimed to be leading the police party involved in the encounter, confessed in their cross-examination that there was no firing on the spot when the party reached the spot, Syed Shahid admitted. That the police encounter continued for a while. ; The accused (in the courtroom) were shouting that they should not be killed because they were ready to surrender and the accused saw them as they raised their hands and had weapons in front of them. The statements were sufficient to show that the accused had voluntarily surrendered to the police party and there was no question of preventing the police party from performing its duties or obstructing it in any way. Had not happened, was surrounded by residents, but did not witness the arrest of any private individuals. Or went The recovery of the accused or the weapons of the crime was not proved to be an encounter, nor was there any evidence to suggest that the police party had attempted to commit his murder prosecution, in which case the accused was guilty of the crime. The material recorded by the Special Judge was unsuccessful, and for good reasons it was admirable and not binding. The sentence cannot be sustained on the basis of the allegations. property advocate from Tharparkar lawyer