MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR
Sections 62, 265C, 435 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34, to provide copies of statements of recorded witnesses during the trial and to respondent's complaint before the record was sought. The IR was filed, but after the investigative case has been canceled the complainant has filed a direct complaint against the applicants / accused under the same offense, as stated in section 2?34 / 34, P.P.C. Said that the complainant was charged against the applicant / accused in the case and the applicant supplied the statements of the recorded prosecution witnesses during the investigation. Was applied for s. The first FIR case related to the same incident, but the trial court dismissed the petitioner / accused and the petitioner filed a review against such dismissal order, to stand trial for the charge of murder. The interests of the accused were protected under the provisions of Section 265C, CRPC. For those who needed copies of the evidence to be presented to them, they were given seven days before the trial of the Section 265C, CRPC, so that the accused could know that they had Was sentenced to death or sentenced to life imprisonment for trial so that they could have proof that what they were required to meet at trial was section 265C (2). , The PCs were supposed to freely admit that this meant providing the documents of private oral or documentary documents to the accused in private documents before the trial began. It will go Investigate the case during the trial
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Punch lawyer