Find a Lawyer

SYED GHULAM MUSTAFA SHAH versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Sections 161, 163 and 164 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application In the anti-constitutional application of the abrogation of land, the legality and validity of the orders passed by the Revenue Authorities were challenged, for convenience, reference Was given. As the \ claimant \ and \ heirs dispute the adjoining property on the approximately one acre of land was allotted to the claimant to fulfill his certified claim, the claimant from the land allegedly approx. acres surrendered an area of 51? acres and chose to purchase the same as provided under Martial Law Regulation No./1/91 and claimed that the entire amount was given by the Barrage Authority / Colonial Officer to Harris in a disputed area. The claim was submitted by the Claimant by the Additional Commissioner who issued his order Was approved. Illegal by the Colonization Officer and on the land which. The matter was given to Harris, the central government said, or that the Department of Additional Commissioners was challenged by the Judicial Board of Revenue and the two groups before the board when the hearing parties found that the colonial officer's The order approved was appropriate and the order passed by the Additional Commissioner upon submission of the review by the additional claimant was fixed. Member, Member Board of Revenue, modifying its earlier order, stated that grant of inheritance during the ban period was illegal and against Government policy and the Member Board of Revenue was canceled The order observed that the elephant famous high court advocate from Sagri lawyer