Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SHAFIQ TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Sections 32, 33 and 156 (1) of section RO 738 (I) / 90, Article 11 7 of 1990 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Return of Export Duty, Impact of application for plates raised in application Huawei was falsely accused of exporting cotton yarn, which was not subject to the payment of export duty. Even if the goods were considered cotton yarn, export duty was not payable after the issuance of Section RO 738 (I) / 90 and that Section RO was discriminated against and hence issued notice and export. The driver was to be fined. In an attempt to defraud the state exchequer by filing a return claim, he did not make a false statement by deliberately misrepresenting the goods and subsequently repeatedly declaring the cotton yarn, but only presented. His argument in support of this claim cannot be interpreted as false claim or false statement, nor does it equate to false statement. No document was alleged to be hidden or blocked by the exporter. Or reject the claim that no refund was made by the department against the law and declared it against the law and without jurisdiction law websites from Phalia lawyer