Find a Lawyer

IQBAL PYAR ALI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 18 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Section 2 (3) Release of Continuous Goods of Goods was not issued after the High Court order, even after the High Court order Also, the goods were released three months after the complaint was filed with the Federal Tax Ombudsman customs authorities, which was attributed to the delayed importer, though the circumstances have clearly proved that customs officials are releasing the goods at every step. Fried not to do so and it was established that they did not comply with this order. The Collector (Appellate Tribunal), the Appellate Tribunal and the High Court Customs stopped the clearance at every step; the admission bill was filed on 15 11 2002 and finally the goods were issued on 4 3 2004 and the delay in decision-making was imminent. There was no justification, and the failure of the customs authorities to finalize the process according to the law resulted in a completely unusual delay. The CT was solely established against the Customs Department with equity, fair performance and efficiency in the discharge of its duties, against which no order was submitted by the Department, delay and detention certificate. Should be released. Container and detention charges should be allowed customs and exemption Federal Tax Ombudsman recommends that the Central Board of Revenue be issued a delay and detention certificate for the waiver of port trust charges and to waive container charges. Necessary action must be taken. Fifteen days \ r \ n family advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer