J.L. PAUL & SONS versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, EXCISE AND TAXATION, PUNJAB
Article 199 of the Constitution The application of natural justice, the principle of delegation imposed by the High Court in any other constitutional petition, was not for any other function but for a person, nor a person who had the opportunity to be heard. Apply and then pass the speech order There is no concept of delegation in the judicial process. That is, there was a hearing by someone else and a decision by someone else that could be considered as much and it could be considered legitimate that a report could be received in the name of such person. The court officials were bound to hear and decide the matter on certain aspects of the matter but on their own consideration otherwise a valuable right to a party's hearing could be waived. The one hearing the matter on his behalf was completely unnecessary and infringing. The principles of the Natural Justice Order, passed by Personal Designa on the basis of another artist's hearing, were not sustainable in the law and had to be Was not declared to have any legal effect.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
