Find a Lawyer

SIRAJ DIN versus AKBAR ALI

Article 25 Civil court jurisdiction The final result of the fact by the courts below the dispute between the parties is that the ruling on the allotment of land in lieu of the claim of the disputed person is the final limitation for the challenge by either party. Reached Before the settlement authority and the civil suit filed by the plaintiffs, the dispute was not related to the allotment of land but it was related to the appellant's rights in the property as the three below the legal heritage of the displaced person. The fact of the court shows that the defendant was the sole legal heir as the son of the homeless person and that the appellant was not the sister of the IDPs who were raised by the appellant that the civil court Had no jurisdiction to decide on the issue, which is not legally binding, Did not face. Any other defect satisfied with the privilege or affirmation of the displaced person in the forum C lam parties dispute each other's claims in favor of the inheritance of the displaced persons. The Supreme Court had specifically ruled out interference in the verdict, and the appeal was rejected by the external courts. best law firm from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer