IKRAM BARI versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Section 2A & 4 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 24A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Termination of service from the Godown Staff / Daily Wages Employees Reimbursement, Return Benefits, Employees Grant was working with the bank. In the last several years, the bank terminated its services on daily wages in various categories on the basis that although the employees were appointed by the bank, their salary was still being paid by the lenders / lenders, the legitimacy of the Supreme. The Court found it difficult to maintain the Bank's view. To temporarily govern the warehouse staff and employees of daily wages indefinitely, on indefinite periods of service and terms of service, the Bank shall be fair, fair and just under the provisions of Section 24A of the General Clause Act, 1897 Needed to work together. Because of his fear of being unemployed and being shown a door, he had no choice but to accept the appointment and continue on whatever terms he offered. The bank's Red Service Tribunal properly imposed a three-year term in service length, with regular appointments and a termination of more than fifteen days between the termination of service to regulate the service of such employees. And they were also in line with the policy. According to the bank's decision from time to time, employees were woken up to more than a decade of deep sleep to resolve their grievances, so it would be unfair and uneventful to provide them with service-backed benefits from their dates. In the initial appointments, the Supreme Court issued appointment letters to the employees on the bank
property advocate from Kohistan lawyer
