MESSRS NEW QURESHI AGRO TRADERS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
The petitioner, who had obtained a loan from the plaintiff's bank, did not bring anything on record to show that the petition for leave and defense on the application for the recovery of suit 10 and 22 suit loan was made so as to indicate. That the bank had put some pressure. The material fact was signed by the bank's branch manager, who was authorized by the banking court to sign the plaintiff under the law that the entire amount claimed by the bank was executed as a financing agreement. Established as payable. The documents attached to the plaintiff were not denied the signatures and the Banking Court did not refuse, held, he correctly felt that the application for leave to defend was in line with the law or the facts. No specific questions were raised about which proof is needed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
