Find a Lawyer

MST. MARGRATE versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER SCHOOLS AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT CHARSADDA

The Constitution Petitions for Arts 3, 11, 29 and 1991 were formally designated as super in the BPS1 to withhold or withhold the applicant's salary and posted in the Government Girls' School Petition which completed the formalities of coddle. After taking charge of his duties, he started serving there. Applicant was performing his duties to the satisfaction of the Principal of the concerned school and the Principal submitted the applicant's pay bill to the District Account Officer, but the bill was returned without any applicant, under the circumstances. Prevented / withheld without any legal justification, and the woman and her family were deprived of their bread and butter, the applicant's appointment was in accordance with the rules and regulations against the formally approved post. The vacant petitioner was vacant at the time of appointment. All emoluments on the grade and salary scale that were not allowable allowances were under the law, no concept of providing service without pay, nor was the applicant's approval of forced labor to perform such duties. Which is prohibited by Article 11 of the Constitution which was obliged to act under Article 29 of the Constitution. In principle, according to the principles laid down in Chapter II of the Constitution that relate to their functions, since the Applicants' Payments withholding Act, their appointment was contrary to the principles of the policy. The party that also violated Article 3 of the Constitution in which the State was obliged to exercise its capabilities and functions best law firms from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer