Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA ALIAS CHOTA KAKA versus STATE

Section 302 Criminal Code (v. 1898), the admission of section 544 evidence was not suspected in the presence of a prosecution witness present at the relevant time; Has made a clear improvement. Medical evidence also claimed that the defense's request was that the accused be encouraged to learn that his sister had been defamed and mistreated, to inquire into the incident. Went to the shop and injured the investigating officer during the punch. When the trial court submitted, the defendant's complaint and his request to keep both copies of the defense in the juxtaposition were approved, much to the defense's request. There was more power that was supported by the circumstances of this case, even when there were two views about the same incident, The trial of the accused accused in section 2 .. (C) falls within the scope of PPC and not under section 2302 (b), under PPC, under PPC, under trial Was convicted of the offenses under section 2302 (b), and was convicted under section 2302 (c), PPC and sentenced to ten years RI with the benefit of section 2382b, Cr. Was gone The PC committed the death of the accused due to his unethical act, the legal heirs of the victim were not entitled to any compensation as required under Section 544A, CRPC. immigration advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer