Find a Lawyer

MRS. MUSHTAR JAHAN versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN

Section 7A (4) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Airport Security Force employees' right to request service jurisdiction Tribunal disciplinary proceedings and administrative proceedings of airport security force employees An action was taken against the department and as a result it is important process. Prior to the dismissal of the service tribunal, a penalty was appealed on the ground that in view of section 7A (4) of the Airport Security Force Act 1975, the service tribunal had no jurisdiction over the matter raised by the employees. It was that disciplinary proceedings should be initiated under it. The Civil Servants Act, 1973, and the rules made there under, while administrative action should be taken under the Pakistan Army Act 1952 and the Airport Security Force Act, 1975, legitimate employees of the Airport Security Force for all practical and disciplinary purposes, the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 Were under Employees' grievances can only be resolved by accessing the forums available in the High Employment, because of violations of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, the Airport Security Force Act, 1975 and the rules made thereunder, irrespective of the procedure. No line of discrimination was drawn between the disciplinary proceedings and the administrative proceedings the Supreme Court found no rationale behind the idea. Action should be initiated under the Civil Servants Act, 1973, and rules and administrative proceedings made under it should be made under the Pakistan Army Act 1952 and the Airport Security Force Act 1975, the Federal Service Tribunal has no jurisdiction over this decision. Was to decide the appeals of the department. E criminal advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer