Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY EDUCATION (SCHOOLS), GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE versus TARIQ MEHMOOD, PTC TEACHER

Section 2 (e), 4 and 21 of the Amendment Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 (2), the single judge of the Proviso Intra Court of Appeal Maintenance High Court, accepted the employee's claim in connection with the payment of salaries, An Intro-Court of Appeal was filed, stating that the salary of the civil servant was a part of his terms and conditions of service and that the evidence was shown in section 2 (e) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974. Whose pay should be withheld. According to section 21 of the said Act, before and after the appellate authorities, he had the right to file an appeal before the service tribunal on the basis of section 4, even if the public servant failed to avail himself of such litigation. , The intra-court appeal will not be enforceable in the light of the proviso. Section 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972 immigration advocates email from Mohmand lawyer