Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF versus MUZAMMAL MEHDI

According to the Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 contract for sale agreement, the defendant / seller receives a special performance suit, a large sum of money, and the balance is to be received by the seller's lawyer within three months. And then there is the sales contract. The performance of the contract was denied by the plaintiff / seller, the plaintiff / vendor filed a specific performance of the contract against the plaintiff / vendor, as well as the terms of the trial court and the appeal court dismissed. ? The sale agreement shows that the plaintiff / seller's general attorney has to receive the remaining sales transaction within three months from the plaintiff / seller and have to execute and complete the sale document and if the remaining payment is offered. If it is not the duty of the plaintiff / seller, then any delay was from the plaintiff / vendor, which was not fatal in the case of the plaintiff, esp sincerely when the witness presented by the defendant also stated clearly. It was said that the claimant / shopkeeper was continually meeting the defendant / seller, but the seller was pretending to be his tenant. After settling this dispute, they will receive the money from the plaintiff / vendor. And in the case of real estate contracts, time was not considered the essence of the contract. The words used in the sale agreement did not indicate that the parties intended to create a three-month period for the essence to occur. The agreement and no specific exception terms were used to enable the parties to do so in the absence of a three-month period. pakistani advocates Vehari lawyer