MAZHAR AHMED versus STATE
Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) and 51 bail, caught on refusing to go on a motorcycle, his personal search in the presence of witnesses yielded one and half kilos of opium. He tied his waist in two bags, witnesses backed the Chemical Examiner's prosecution case report on the recovered drug sample; no enmity was expressed between the suspect and the investigating officer; It remains to be believed that those involved in the case who came under the Prohibited Clause of Section 51 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, and were not entitled to bail on the merits, were the reason for the delay in settlement of this case. There were only two courts in Karachi. In order to deal with such matters which could not possibly be dealt with due to the increasing length of cases, the case was transferred to a special court as it was old. (CN Section) The Special Court, headed by the Sessions Judge, directed the prosecution to dispose of the case in accordance with the law, to present all the witnesses in the shortest possible time before the aforesaid court. The bail application was dismissed under.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Laliah lawyer