Section 3 (d) Appreciating Evidence Detectives reportedly indicated the arrest of the accused, but no private witness was associated with the retrieval, there was no desertion despite the arrest because it was close to the village where the private The witnesses could easily be made available. The non-participation of the private witnesses with the recovery proceedings was not free of any complaint, the investigating officer and the arresting officer were the ones who presented the challan against the accused, which, of course, was sufficient. Was innocent and could be considered to have caused the accused to be prejudiced. The weapon recovered from the accused was not sent for a test to ensure that it was in working condition. The prosecution failed to establish the suspect beyond reasonable doubt; It has the benefit of the doubt
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
