Find a Lawyer

SYED MEHMOOD ALI versus NETWORK TELEVISION MARKETING (PVT.) LTD

Articles 3, 4 and 9 of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), the section 499 defamation case for damages, the 2002 declaration of contempt of court ordinance, have been declared defamation under the Constitution Act (once Section 3, 4 and 9 of the Defamation Ordinance 2002) establishes that misconduct has been committed, injury or loss of credit, and goodwill has been considered. Such a principle is now amended in section 4, defamation honor ordinance. Accepted in 2002, in the present case, it has been acknowledged that the unidentified documentary film, which includes unknown persons, was the concern and product of the plaintiffs, but justified. A. Defending, justifying comments, or any other defensible defense in such proceedings will not eliminate the effect of defamation altogether, but may be construed as a defamation and / or mitigating circumstance. ) Although he justified it, he was not led by either of the other plaintiffs, the author of the script. Defendant (after inaction) dismissed the case against him, once defamation was proved. Damage, injury and loss to one's reputation, error and inference, as the commercial goods or goods may have been, were deemed authoritative as the documentary was not correct, so there was no difficulty in concluding. That the darkening documentary was telecast twice, damaging estimates, sabotage and mitigation against the plaintiff and his product's criminal goodwill, changing criminal liability, civil liability, slander or treason. Not based, but on the reality of notoriety advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer