Find a Lawyer

MST. KANEEZ AKHTAR versus ABDUL QADOOS

Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application The nature of the child's minority welfare father's minor son was about 12 years of age and has been living with his mother since the divorced father in the Army. Was serving and sought custody of the juvenile Guardian Judge granted the request and found the father entitled to custody Guardian Judge's decision was upheld by the appellate court, which was taken by the mother The nature of the father's responsibility was such that he could not care for the minor and was not considered by both courts. Intellectual preference for minority The two courts did not recognize the child's intelligent preference, even ignoring that the minor had been in special custody of the mother's care and upbringing since the divorce. Was being presented. The child was not found to be illegitimate or the mother's right to meet the child and such arrangements were not insane. Nothing was available on file to support the father's claim of custody by the courts, This shows that they have something to do with them, from which they are taking care of their academic careers and providing them with care. The thirst for judgment on the minor issue and the flaws found by the High Court are reflected negatively on the orders of the Guardian Judge and Appellate Court regarding parental disqualification based on the parameters laid down under Islamic law. In her absence, excluding the mother from her child, for the time being, appeared to be extremely difficult, the High Court observed. family advocate from Kandhkot lawyer