Find a Lawyer

STATE versus KHAN MUHAMMAD ALIAS KHANAN

Section 302 (b) / 149 and 148 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 Suppressing Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 7 appeals against the witnesses' motive for acquittal. Had happened Not only was the deceased interested, but with the guilt of confession, they were enmity and enmity with the accused, but their presence at the scene of the incident and their presence in fact was made beyond any doubt. Only the two accused were identified. Specifically, witnesses and suspects in the FIR were not exaggerated to designate their role in the commission of the crime, and recovery from medical evidence and recovery was safely reliable, Although the available witnesses have not come forward to oust the accused, as now generally one day people do not want to be hostile to any group, the heirs are at risk in such heinous cases and in prosecution cases Examination was not fatal, trial court excluded evidence of restoration of recovery evidence on the basis of its vehement witness They were, but that has been the support and it has been confirmed. By the Investigating Officer, who had no evidence of any hostility to the accused, Kalashnikov was released, on the notice of the main accused, released under section 13 (e) of the Arms Ordinance, 1965, free of the four offenders on the occasion of the accused. was done. The evidence and judgment recorded in the case against the two main accused present in a separate trial had no effect, thus, any suspicion for the murder of the deceased proved beyond any doubt and they had to be executed in section 22 (b), p. Pc list of supreme court advocates from Naukundi lawyer