Find a Lawyer

SYED NAZIR HUSSAIN RIZVI versus ZAHOOR AHMAD

OVI, R 17 and O XXXVII, R 2 wanted to amend the case for applications for recovery of money on the basis of the plaintiff's note, in the present case, through the modification of the applications as if the order was based on The promissory note was not given by the entire procedure on the basis of the order; the suit could be considered a simple suit and the order could be subject to merit by following the general procedure. The proposed amendment may not be considered cbntradictory or mutually destructive, but on the contrary it will. Reduce the likelihood of litigation that is the primary purpose of the provisions contained in the VI, R 17, CPC Rule. immigration advocates contact from Dhoun Kal lawyer