Find a Lawyer

SYED MUHAMMAD FIRDAUS versus STATE

Article 498 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/322/319/353/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Guaranteed Before Arrest, None of the two accused are designated doctors Was filed by the FIR Trial Court in this case dismissing the request of a doctor as the accused for which no order was accepted by the complainant, no evidence is available to the expert which It appears that the deceased was due to transfer from Sialkot to Lahore. Arrangements, criminal negligence of the other doctor were not established under the law. The accused police officers had no role in the FIR for their criminal negligence in initiating rescue operations. Complainants 'and other witnesses' conspiracy to initiate negligence operations against the sessions judge's instructions will be determined by law by the trial court, according to the evidence, at this point, it appears contradictory to the matter. According to medical evidence, the deceased judicial officers were evacuated from a nearby area, they were killed by the accused police officers, First Fax, it cannot be believed that they did their best to save the hostages. Is In the event of an operation in the event of an emergency and if he did not do so, he too would be liable to fail to perform his duty, because under the doctrine of rescue the emergency is sometimes justified, otherwise a black and white one. In the white matter, the prosecutor himself was not beheaded with any criminal liability and the trial court, upon seeing and seeking records of his case. female advocates from Naukot lawyer