Find a Lawyer

ASDULLAH MANGI versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 Appellants believed that they were given full training of flight stewards as they had completed training at PIA Center for Flight stewardship and were given staff uniform but they were employed. Was not included, but other persons were included in the training and thus the appellant was discriminated against in violation of their fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution. Job Letter Offer Predictable Hint It was pointed out that this is a simple offer that does not equate to an appointment letter. The proposal reflects that the appellants were advised to report to the corporation's manager employment for further proceedings that the letter was formally fulfilled by the letter and had no comment on the actual appointment because Trainee. The flight was subject to stewardship. By any imagination, the completion of the training and Letter of Offer is considered as an appointment letter to BE that the appellants were never appointed to the post of flight steward, but it has been admitted that they have been trained on this basis. Was selected as a flight steward, which cannot be inferred that he was in fact appointed as a flight steward. There was a difference between a regular appointment as a train flight steward and a flight steward, and a line of distinction was to be made between the two appellants, which was informed by the letter that they could not do so as a result of reviewing the relevant record. To be included as a flight steward because his selection was due to political pressure at the relevant time. best advocate from Chaininda lawyer