Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR HUSSAIN ALIAS THAH versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / evidence 34 Definitions of evidence Prior to this incident, the parties were disposed of abnormally. Eyewitnesses were interested witnesses who did not give an accurate account of the incident, because they either did not see it with their own eyes or they were falsely expelled against the accused because of enmity with them. The evidence contradicted the ocular testimony, where there was no reasonable explanation for the case, and the critical delay of two hours in reporting to the police was fatal to the prosecution and the FIR was summoned again after a preliminary investigation. The value of his identification was terminated because the ocular testimony was not credible, it could not be used for the purpose that there was no crime on the spot, the recovery of firearms from the accused was unnecessary. No evidence of a fugitive was found. Record defendants were acquitted on the benefit of doubt in the circumstances by any definitive evidence jobs for advocates from Narowal lawyer