Find a Lawyer

KHURRAM SHAFI versus MST. INAYAT BIBI

Section 550 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), sections 12 and 54 of the Superior Police were barred from the applicant's suit filed by the applicant in the custody of the vehicle, in which he prayed that the vehicle be removed. On the ground, the applicant obtained the superdi of the vehicle on the ground. That they had purchased the respondent's owner through an oral agreement by the magistrate and the applicant was given a car spray, which was upheld by the amending court, but was valid in the constitutional petition. Was, while the judge dismissed the matter, saying that the applicant had not presented any. Vehicle sales contract between parties. And since the dispute was a matter of dispute, the permanent injunction case was not sustained, but it should have been sued for the specific performance of the contract, which was not challenged by the petitioner in front of any higher forum, which The deadline was reached, the applicant did not bring any documents. The record order does not guarantee any interference to substantiate his claim considering the record law firms from Barkhan lawyer