Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ BUTT versus STATE

Validating Section 9c evidence Recovery and recovery of large quantities of 165 bags containing 405 kilograms each of the defendants' detention was proved by prosecution witnesses who have no animosity or hostility. There were constant minor differences. Was punctuated by a time barrier that could not fail the trial, nor did the suspected chemical executor confirm the material recovered from the suspect as a intoxicating substance, of which false accusations There was no reason. Section 103, CRP was not applicable In this case, even if those involved in the drug trade as equipped groups, no one could dare to expel them at the cost of their enmity. It was alleged that he was involved in the illegal drug trafficking business of local herbs and his plea was a deliberate matter that was not removed from the evidence on record. Kept, however, the drug "logic" was recovered from the accused, sentenced to life imprisonment and imprisoned for ten years. Well appeals were dismissed with \ r \ n \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Dhoun Kal lawyer