Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF MEMON THROUGH ATTORNEY versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT THROUGH DISTRICT COORDINATE OFFICER

Section 39 and 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition, with tampering with taxes, the High Court applicants had inquired into the village VII of the income tax records examination. Their predecessors were allotted / leased in interest, which were later transferred in their favor, after which the High Court summoned the records and checked that the entries kept by the relevant authority in favor of the applicants. Revenue was a violation of law registration. Applicants were kept without looking at the same entries available in the record, whereby the leases in favor of the applicants in the interest of the applicants were previously canceled in red in accordance with the orders of the then Deputy Commissioner against the registration. Was. Against such entries by the concerned officer and still in the village VIII Ch note on seven different places of the same entries, the relevant authority had kept fresh entries in favor of the applicants. Behl () was replaced with a different pen. Impact High Court observed the tampering with the record, directed the department to initiate criminal proceedings against the concerned Mukhtarkar and Tepadar by filing an FIR, adding that the High Court had directed the Board of Revenue or any other authority. Instantly initiate disciplinary proceedings against the concerned. Mukhtarkar and Tapedar High Court refused to interfere with the entries and left the matter open to the applicants, if any, rejecting the application under the Income Tax Act lawer from fb area from Pindi Bhattian lawyer