Find a Lawyer

RAUF BAKSH KADRI versus M/S. NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

Sections 9, 290, 291, 292, 305, 309, 152, 161 and 233 Companies (Court) Rules, 1997, R7 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), OI, R1 Five different petitions / petitions were filed. The future profits, along with the payment of the profits announced in the past, to the defendants praying under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 for the High Court One, Companies Accounts / Distribution and Distribution of Company Assets under Sections 290, 291 and 292 Request payment Applicants, and do not prevent them from entering the factory premises and inspect their accounts and operations. The second application, read under section 309, was filed under section 305, Companies Ordinance, 1984, for the consolidation of the company, under which any legal action was taken to handle the company's assets and accounts, including the applicants' averted assets. Prayers were made for appointment. Secured and made from company funds; Third Applicant, under the OI, R1, CPC, requested to be included as an interlocutor on a similar basis. The fourth petition was filed by a company under section 152, Companies Ordinance, 1984, for the purpose of amending the register of members and registering its name as a member, claiming to be 1, of the same purchase. Holds 800,000 shares and the fifth application was filed under Section 161 &. 152 read with Sections 290 and 233, Companies Ordinance 1984, which directed that they convene an unusual general meeting of members to select directors on the basis of their shares, and with the last member the members Apply for registration correction solicitors from Chawinda lawyer