The Ephedrine quota case against the accused in the section 498 Control of the Narcotic Sub-Maturity Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) and 16 Ed interim pre-arrest bail, meant that the company allocated 500 kilograms of Ephedrine quota to Ephedrine. That was not used. The drug manufacture was sold to smugglers, applying for a license in connection with Ephedrine, its quota and subsequently supplied by pharmaceutical companies / firms or their officials for misuse of the allotted quota. Was not denied about. In light of the available records, the investigating officer was still in the process of collecting evidence; no evidence was available to link the accused to a crime commission under sections 6, 7 and 8 of the Drug Substances Act 1997 Was. So far, the best prosecutor is trying to sue for Section 16 violation of narcotic substance control. Another inquiry from the Act, 1997, which was a guaranteed offense, the pre-arrest bail of the advertisement was already granted to the accused, it was confirmed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
