Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI versus STATE

Clarifying his report as a court witness to the defendant on behalf of the Section 540 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 36 (2) and the Summoning of the Chemical Examiner Trial Court The request to be removed was rejected. Observe that he can dismiss the report by adding some other independent evidence. Such a theory could not be corroborated by the trial court, as it would ultimately be prejudicial to the defendant's defense, as the expert could answer his report only after answering any question. Is. The witness box law also gave the court the authority to seek the expert if it was deemed necessary, in the interest of justice, to allege that the court had no prejudice to the completeness and accuracy of the chemical examiner's expert examination report. Will not cause As the prosecution will have the opportunity to review the evidence of the Chemical Examiner for the decision in this case, the trial court has directed the trial court to summon the chemical examiner and examine him as a court witness. The order was canceled as well female advocates from Hyderabad lawyer